As it is not only a religion but a way of life, Islam fostered the development of a distinctive culture with its own unique artistic language that is reflected in art and architecture throughout the Muslim world.
The lands newly conquered by the Muslims had their own preexisting artistic traditions and, initially at least, those artists who had worked under Byzantine or Sasanian patronage continued to work in their own indigenous styles but for Muslim patrons. The first examples of Islamic art therefore rely on earlier techniques, styles, and forms reflecting this blending of classical and Iranian decorative themes and motifs. Even religious monuments erected under Umayyad patronage that have a clearly Islamic function and meaning, such as the Dome of the Rock in Jerusalem, demonstrate this amalgam of Greco-Roman, Byzantine, and Sasanian elements. Only gradually, under the impact of the Muslim faith and nascent Islamic state, did a uniquely Islamic art emerge. The rule of the Umayyad caliphate (661–750) is often considered to be the formative period in Islamic art. One method of classifying Islamic art, used in the Islamic galleries at the Metropolitan Museum, is according to the dynasty reigning when the work of art was produced. This type of periodization follows the general precepts of Islamic history, which is divided into and punctuated by the rule of various dynasties, beginning with the Umayyad and cAbbasid dynasties that governed a vast and unified Islamic state, and concluding with the more regional, though powerful, dynasties such as the Safavids, Ottomans, and Mughals.
With its geographic spread and long history, Islamic art was inevitably subject to a wide ran
Citation
Department of Islamic Art. “The Nature of Islamic Art”. In Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2000–. http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/orna/hd_orna.htm (October 2001)
Suggested Further Readings
- Bloom, Jonathan M., and Sheila S. Blair. The Art and Architecture of Islam, 1250–1800. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1995.
- Ettinghausen, Richard, Oleg Grabar, and Marilyn Jenkins-Madina. Islamic Art and Architecture, 650–1250. 2d ed. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2001.
These related Museum Bulletin or Journal articles may or may not represent the most current scholarship.
- Alexander, David G. “The Guarded Tablet.” Metropolitan Museum Journal, Vol. 24 (1989).
- Ettinghausen, Richard. “The Flowering of Seljuq Art.” Metropolitan Museum Journal, Vol. 3 (1970).
















![his carved tile was originally set into the facade of a building in present-day Uzbekistan. The central panel consists of a deeply carved Arabic inscription in plaited kufic script against a background of vegetal scrolls covered in a luminous transparent turquoise glaze. The inscription, which reads "[al-mulk] li-llah al-mu[lk li-llah]" (Sovereignty is for God. Sovereignty is for God), is framed by two narrow light blue borders and is crowned by a wide panel with seven vertical bands in alternating turquoise and white with a horizontal border in dark manganese at the top.](http://lh4.ggpht.com/_pfNUY4XVhx4/TYEHlXols_I/AAAAAAAAFhA/dQZl6KB5FaI/s144-c/hb_2006_274.jpg)






![The animals on this dish, some more recognizable than others, may derive from representations on Seljuq metalwork. The central design is, in effect, a painted menagerie, an approach not often attempted by Iznik potters before around 1570. Another group of animals pursue one another on the rim of the dish. The bold effect of the bright green ground is heightened by the potter's decision to leave the cavetto blank, in essence providing breathing room for the composition. Source: Dish [Iznik, Turkey] (1979.412) | Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History | The Metropolitan Museum of Art](http://lh4.ggpht.com/_pfNUY4XVhx4/TYEIf5LHoPI/AAAAAAAAFhk/4uuyU-vg_Ag/s144-c/hb_1979_412.jpg)


















